Santa Rosa Infrastructure Air Permit

144 Results

Sort:

Comment From: Jenny Smith

10/19/26 @ 11:25 AM
As General Manager of a contracting company, we agree, this will help with reducing emissions into the environment, add more space for other possible utilities.

I feel this is a responsible move by the company as it shows their constant push for a g...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Keith Brower

10/15/26 @ 12:00 AM
Attachments:

Comment From: Mike Smith

10/08/26 @ 5:32 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: Joe Jones

10/06/26 @ 12:00 AM
Attachments:

Comment From: Hannah Lewis

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
This project may be feasible, but only with conditions that protect surrounding residents. The permit should require best available control technology, routine inspections, transparent reporting, and a clear complaint process. It should also account ...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Aaron Fischer

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
Please ensure the permit includes enforceable emission limits for all operating modes, not just normal production. Startup, shutdown, maintenance, and malfunction periods can produce significant emissions. The permit should require detailed logs for ...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Hector Ramirez

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
The draft analysis should consider greenhouse gas emissions as well as conventional pollutants. This project may operate for decades, and its climate impacts should not be ignored. Please require energy-efficiency measures, electrification where poss...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Claire Parker

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
I am against this permit and ask the agency to reject the proposal.
No attachments

Comment From: Grace Kim

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
I appreciate that the applicant proposes modern pollution-control technology. However, the permit should make those commitments enforceable rather than descriptive. Please identify the exact equipment, operating parameters, maintenance requirements, ...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Brian Evans

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
I support the proposed facility and hope the agency approves the permit.
No attachments

Comment From: Robert Hale

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
The draft permit does not adequately address cumulative impacts from existing traffic, warehouses, and industrial operations in this area. Adding another emissions source may be significant even if the project meets individual source thresholds. Plea...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Elena Santos

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
Please do not approve this permit until the odor impacts are better explained. Odors may not always violate a numerical standard, but they can still make it difficult for neighbors to enjoy their homes. The permit should require a complaint response ...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Leah Turner

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
The agency should evaluate whether the proposed stack height will disperse pollution into nearby neighborhoods or sensitive natural areas. Dispersion modeling can be difficult for the public to evaluate, so the assumptions and results should be expla...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Vanessa Cooper

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
I strongly oppose this project and believe the permit should be denied.
No attachments

Comment From: Megan Stewart

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
I attended the public meeting and wanted to thank everyone involved in the review process.
No attachments

Comment From: Ethan Coleman

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
The proposed operating hours could create noise and air-quality impacts late at night. The permit should limit high-emission activities during overnight hours when atmospheric conditions may trap pollution closer to the ground. Please also require th...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Jasmine Patel

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
The proposed control equipment sounds reasonable, but the permit should specify testing frequency and required removal efficiency. It is not enough to say the controls will be operated properly. Please include stack testing requirements after install...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Caleb Hughes

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
The permit needs a clearer compliance schedule. Some of the proposed controls appear to be installed after operations begin, which creates unnecessary risk. Please require all major pollution controls to be operational before the facility starts rout...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Andrew Phillips

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
I am in favor of the permit and support moving the project forward.
No attachments

Comment From: Thomas Klein

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
The emissions calculations should be independently reviewed before the permit is finalized. Several assumptions about hours of operation and throughput appear optimistic. If actual production increases, emissions could be higher than stated in the ap...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Laura Mitchell

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
I support this project and believe it will be good for the area.
No attachments

Comment From: Priya Shah

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
I ask the agency to require more transparent reporting. The public should be able to see emissions data, inspection reports, deviation reports, and enforcement actions without filing a records request. A simple online dashboard would help residents u...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Rachel Morgan

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
Thank you for providing an opportunity for the public to comment on this permit.
No attachments

Comment From: Jordan Price

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
The application should better explain how the facility will prevent leaks from tanks, valves, and piping. Small leaks can add up over time and may release hazardous pollutants. Please require a leak detection and repair program with regular inspectio...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Derek Collins

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
I appreciate the agency sharing information about the proposed air permit with the public.
No attachments

Comment From: Alicia Nguyen

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
I support local jobs, but the permit needs stronger protections for air quality. The facility is close to homes, a park, and an elementary school. Please require fence-line monitoring for fine particles, sulfur dioxide, and any hazardous air pollutan...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Samuel Wright

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
The facility should be required to notify neighbors before planned maintenance events that may increase emissions. People deserve to know when flaring, venting, or other unusual activities could affect air quality. Notices should be issued in multipl...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Nathan Young

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
I oppose this air permit and do not think this project should move forward.
No attachments

Comment From: Nina Brooks

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
I am worried about the impact on children and older adults who live nearby. Even small increases in pollution can matter for people with asthma, heart disease, and other health conditions. Please evaluate the project using health-protective assumptio...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Emily Carter

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
I support approval of this air permit and believe the project will be a positive addition to the community.
No attachments

Comment From: Jason Reynolds

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
Please do not approve this permit. I oppose the proposed project.
No attachments

Comment From: Sofia Martinez

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
Please consider the environmental justice implications of this permit. Our community already has multiple pollution sources and fewer resources to manage health impacts. The agency should meet with residents in the neighborhood before making a final ...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Melissa Gray

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
Thank you for considering comments from residents during the permit review process.
No attachments

Comment From: Kevin Morrison

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
The permit should include strict limits on fugitive dust from material handling, storage piles, and truck loading. Windy days can spread dust well beyond a facility boundary. Please require watering, covered conveyors, enclosed transfer points, and d...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Victor Allen

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
I am asking for stronger enforcement language in the final permit. There should be meaningful consequences for missing monitoring deadlines, failing stack tests, or operating control equipment outside approved parameters. Please require immediate rep...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Cole Peterson

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
I do not support this permit and ask the agency not to approve it.
No attachments

Comment From: Marcus Bennett

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
I am concerned that diesel truck traffic associated with this project has not been fully considered. Trucks idling near the site will add emissions that affect nearby residents and workers. The permit should require anti-idling practices and designat...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Maya Reed

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
I live about a mile from the proposed facility and am concerned about additional particulate matter in our neighborhood. The application should explain how emissions will be monitored during startup, shutdown, and equipment malfunctions. Please requi...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Isabella Chen

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
I would like the agency to require independent ambient air monitoring near the site boundary. Company self-reporting is not enough to build trust. Monitoring equipment should be located where nearby residents are most likely to be affected based on p...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Eric Ward

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
I have reviewed the project information and appreciate being able to submit a public comment.
No attachments

Comment From: Daniel Ortiz

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
The permit should set clear limits for nitrogen oxides and volatile organic compounds. The modeling appears to rely on average operating conditions, but residents experience odors and visible emissions during unusual conditions. Please require the ap...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Olivia Foster

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
I am concerned about emergency releases and accidental emissions. The permit should require a detailed emergency response plan that is coordinated with local fire and health agencies. Residents should know how they will be alerted if a release occurs...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Tanya Ross

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
I support the permit and would like to see the project approved.
No attachments

Comment From: Monique Davis

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
I oppose the permit as drafted because the public record is difficult to understand. Important technical documents are scattered across several files and use unexplained acronyms. Please provide a plain-language summary of emissions, health risks, co...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Avery Bennett

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
Please explain the maximum emissions proposed for the Santa Rosa Infrastructure Project.
I would like separate estimates for nitrogen oxides, particulate matter, and other applicable pollutants.
The analysis should include the busiest operating day rat...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Jordan Foster

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
My main concern about the Santa Rosa Infrastructure Project is the proposed use of backup generators.
Please identify the number of units, their fuels, and their maximum operating hours.
Routine testing should be scheduled to avoid unnecessary disturba...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Morgan Shah

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
The Santa Rosa Infrastructure Project should be evaluated alongside other nearby pollution sources.
Traffic, existing businesses, and construction may already affect the surrounding area.
Please explain how background concentrations were selected for t...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Taylor Ellis

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
Please give construction dust more attention in the Santa Rosa Infrastructure Project review.
Excavation, stockpiles, and truck movements could create problems before regular operations begin.
I would like clear requirements for covering loads and cont...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Cameron Kim

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
I am requesting more information about delivery traffic for the Santa Rosa Infrastructure Project.
Please estimate daily truck trips and identify the proposed access routes.
Unnecessary idling should be limited wherever trucks queue or unload.
No attachments

Comment From: Riley Sullivan

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
The Santa Rosa Infrastructure Project materials should explain expected noise from equipment and deliveries.
Please distinguish daytime operations from nighttime activity.
Noise estimates should include generator testing and other intermittent equipmen...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Parker Navarro

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
I would like a clearer description of the Santa Rosa Infrastructure Project water demand.
Please identify the anticipated supply source and estimated use during hot weather.
The review should explain whether cooling choices affect both water demand and...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Casey Lawson

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
Please explain how the Santa Rosa Infrastructure Project would manage runoff from equipment areas.
Fuel storage and material handling should have appropriate spill prevention measures.
I am concerned about contaminated water entering storm drains durin...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Quinn Torres

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
I support considering the Santa Rosa Infrastructure Project if lower-emission energy options are fully evaluated.
Please compare the proposed equipment with feasible electric and battery alternatives.
The comparison should address reliability as well a...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Reese Chen

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
My support for the Santa Rosa Infrastructure Project depends on meaningful compliance monitoring.
Please identify which emissions would be measured directly and which would be estimated.
Monitoring schedules should be frequent enough to identify operat...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Jamie Moreno

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
The Santa Rosa Infrastructure Project needs clear consequences for violating permit conditions.
Please describe how inspections would be scheduled and documented.
The permit should distinguish minor reporting errors from significant operating exceedanc...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Drew Wallace

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
Please make the Santa Rosa Infrastructure Project application easier for the public to understand.
Technical appendices should be accompanied by a concise explanation of the main assumptions and findings.
Important maps and tables should be readable on...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Rowan Patel

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
The Santa Rosa Infrastructure Project review should explain potential effects on sensitive populations.
Please identify nearby schools, childcare facilities, and senior housing without disclosing private personal information.
The health discussion shou...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Alex Nguyen

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
Please describe the emergency response arrangements for the Santa Rosa Infrastructure Project.
The plan should address equipment failures, fuel spills, and prolonged electrical outages.
I would like to know how local responders would receive relevant s...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Emerson Whitaker

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
I am concerned about possible odors from the Santa Rosa Infrastructure Project.
Please identify activities that could produce noticeable odors during normal operation or maintenance.
The application should explain how odor complaints would be investiga...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Blake Brooks

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
Please make the Santa Rosa Infrastructure Project operating limits specific and easy to find.
The permit should identify approved fuels, equipment capacities, and any restrictions on operating hours.
Please explain whether simultaneous equipment operat...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Dakota Ortiz

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
I am generally supportive of the Santa Rosa Infrastructure Project and its potential economic benefits.
Please explain the expected construction jobs and longer-term employment without overstating what is guaranteed.
Local hiring and training opportuni...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Finley Zimmerman

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
Please include information about landscaping and outdoor lighting for the Santa Rosa Infrastructure Project.
Equipment screening could help reduce visual impacts from surrounding streets.
Lighting should be directed toward the site and avoid unnecessar...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Skyler Delgado

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
I would like more detail about the air dispersion modeling for the Santa Rosa Infrastructure Project.
Please identify the weather data, terrain assumptions, and receptor locations used.
The modeling should consider conditions that could produce higher ...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Hayden Ramsey

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
I have not decided whether to support the Santa Rosa Infrastructure Project.
Before a decision, please explain the main tradeoffs and any remaining information gaps.
The final record should distinguish requirements from voluntary commitments.
No attachments

Comment From: Avery Chen

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
Please explain the maximum emissions proposed for the Santa Rosa Infrastructure Project.
I would like separate estimates for nitrogen oxides, particulate matter, and other applicable pollutants.
The analysis should include the busiest operating day rat...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Jordan Moreno

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
My main concern about the Santa Rosa Infrastructure Project is the proposed use of backup generators.
Please identify the number of units, their fuels, and their maximum operating hours.
Routine testing should be scheduled to avoid unnecessary disturba...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Morgan Wallace

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
The Santa Rosa Infrastructure Project should be evaluated alongside other nearby pollution sources.
Traffic, existing businesses, and construction may already affect the surrounding area.
Please explain how background concentrations were selected for t...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Taylor Patel

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
Please give construction dust more attention in the Santa Rosa Infrastructure Project review.
Excavation, stockpiles, and truck movements could create problems before regular operations begin.
I would like clear requirements for covering loads and cont...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Cameron Nguyen

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
I am requesting more information about delivery traffic for the Santa Rosa Infrastructure Project.
Please estimate daily truck trips and identify the proposed access routes.
Unnecessary idling should be limited wherever trucks queue or unload.
The revie...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Riley Whitaker

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
The Santa Rosa Infrastructure Project materials should explain expected noise from equipment and deliveries.
Please distinguish daytime operations from nighttime activity.
Noise estimates should include generator testing and other intermittent equipmen...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Parker Brooks

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
I would like a clearer description of the Santa Rosa Infrastructure Project water demand.
Please identify the anticipated supply source and estimated use during hot weather.
The review should explain whether cooling choices affect both water demand and...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Casey Ortiz

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
Please explain how the Santa Rosa Infrastructure Project would manage runoff from equipment areas.
Fuel storage and material handling should have appropriate spill prevention measures.
I am concerned about contaminated water entering storm drains durin...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Quinn Zimmerman

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
I support considering the Santa Rosa Infrastructure Project if lower-emission energy options are fully evaluated.
Please compare the proposed equipment with feasible electric and battery alternatives.
The comparison should address reliability as well a...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Reese Delgado

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
My support for the Santa Rosa Infrastructure Project depends on meaningful compliance monitoring.
Please identify which emissions would be measured directly and which would be estimated.
Monitoring schedules should be frequent enough to identify operat...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Jamie Ramsey

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
The Santa Rosa Infrastructure Project needs clear consequences for violating permit conditions.
Please describe how inspections would be scheduled and documented.
The permit should distinguish minor reporting errors from significant operating exceedanc...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Drew Bennett

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
Please make the Santa Rosa Infrastructure Project application easier for the public to understand.
Technical appendices should be accompanied by a concise explanation of the main assumptions and findings.
Important maps and tables should be readable on...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Rowan Foster

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
The Santa Rosa Infrastructure Project review should explain potential effects on sensitive populations.
Please identify nearby schools, childcare facilities, and senior housing without disclosing private personal information.
The health discussion shou...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Alex Shah

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
Please describe the emergency response arrangements for the Santa Rosa Infrastructure Project.
The plan should address equipment failures, fuel spills, and prolonged electrical outages.
I would like to know how local responders would receive relevant s...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Emerson Ellis

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
I am concerned about possible odors from the Santa Rosa Infrastructure Project.
Please identify activities that could produce noticeable odors during normal operation or maintenance.
The application should explain how odor complaints would be investiga...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Blake Kim

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
Please make the Santa Rosa Infrastructure Project operating limits specific and easy to find.
The permit should identify approved fuels, equipment capacities, and any restrictions on operating hours.
Please explain whether simultaneous equipment operat...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Dakota Sullivan

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
I am generally supportive of the Santa Rosa Infrastructure Project and its potential economic benefits.
Please explain the expected construction jobs and longer-term employment without overstating what is guaranteed.
Local hiring and training opportuni...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Finley Navarro

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
Please include information about landscaping and outdoor lighting for the Santa Rosa Infrastructure Project.
Equipment screening could help reduce visual impacts from surrounding streets.
Lighting should be directed toward the site and avoid unnecessar...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Skyler Lawson

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
I would like more detail about the air dispersion modeling for the Santa Rosa Infrastructure Project.
Please identify the weather data, terrain assumptions, and receptor locations used.
The modeling should consider conditions that could produce higher ...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Hayden Torres

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
I have not decided whether to support the Santa Rosa Infrastructure Project.
Before a decision, please explain the main tradeoffs and any remaining information gaps.
The final record should distinguish requirements from voluntary commitments.
I would li...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Avery Delgado

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
Please explain the maximum emissions proposed for the Santa Rosa Infrastructure Project.
I would like separate estimates for nitrogen oxides, particulate matter, and other applicable pollutants.
The analysis should include the busiest operating day rat...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Jordan Ramsey

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
My main concern about the Santa Rosa Infrastructure Project is the proposed use of backup generators.
Please identify the number of units, their fuels, and their maximum operating hours.
Routine testing should be scheduled to avoid unnecessary disturba...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Morgan Bennett

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
The Santa Rosa Infrastructure Project should be evaluated alongside other nearby pollution sources.
Traffic, existing businesses, and construction may already affect the surrounding area.
Please explain how background concentrations were selected for t...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Taylor Foster

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
Please give construction dust more attention in the Santa Rosa Infrastructure Project review.
Excavation, stockpiles, and truck movements could create problems before regular operations begin.
I would like clear requirements for covering loads and cont...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Cameron Shah

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
I am requesting more information about delivery traffic for the Santa Rosa Infrastructure Project.
Please estimate daily truck trips and identify the proposed access routes.
Unnecessary idling should be limited wherever trucks queue or unload.
The revie...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Riley Ellis

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
The Santa Rosa Infrastructure Project materials should explain expected noise from equipment and deliveries.
Please distinguish daytime operations from nighttime activity.
Noise estimates should include generator testing and other intermittent equipmen...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Parker Kim

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
I would like a clearer description of the Santa Rosa Infrastructure Project water demand.
Please identify the anticipated supply source and estimated use during hot weather.
The review should explain whether cooling choices affect both water demand and...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Casey Sullivan

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
Please explain how the Santa Rosa Infrastructure Project would manage runoff from equipment areas.
Fuel storage and material handling should have appropriate spill prevention measures.
I am concerned about contaminated water entering storm drains durin...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Quinn Navarro

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
I support considering the Santa Rosa Infrastructure Project if lower-emission energy options are fully evaluated.
Please compare the proposed equipment with feasible electric and battery alternatives.
The comparison should address reliability as well a...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Reese Lawson

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
My support for the Santa Rosa Infrastructure Project depends on meaningful compliance monitoring.
Please identify which emissions would be measured directly and which would be estimated.
Monitoring schedules should be frequent enough to identify operat...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Jamie Torres

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
The Santa Rosa Infrastructure Project needs clear consequences for violating permit conditions.
Please describe how inspections would be scheduled and documented.
The permit should distinguish minor reporting errors from significant operating exceedanc...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Drew Chen

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
Please make the Santa Rosa Infrastructure Project application easier for the public to understand.
Technical appendices should be accompanied by a concise explanation of the main assumptions and findings.
Important maps and tables should be readable on...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Rowan Moreno

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
The Santa Rosa Infrastructure Project review should explain potential effects on sensitive populations.
Please identify nearby schools, childcare facilities, and senior housing without disclosing private personal information.
The health discussion shou...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Alex Wallace

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
Please describe the emergency response arrangements for the Santa Rosa Infrastructure Project.
The plan should address equipment failures, fuel spills, and prolonged electrical outages.
I would like to know how local responders would receive relevant s...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Emerson Patel

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
I am concerned about possible odors from the Santa Rosa Infrastructure Project.
Please identify activities that could produce noticeable odors during normal operation or maintenance.
The application should explain how odor complaints would be investiga...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Blake Nguyen

10/01/26 @ 12:00 AM
Please make the Santa Rosa Infrastructure Project operating limits specific and easy to find.
The permit should identify approved fuels, equipment capacities, and any restrictions on operating hours.
Please explain whether simultaneous equipment operat...↓
No attachments

[ Previous Page / Next Page ]